Whitepaper 2026 — Legal sector

AI is changing
the legal sector
faster than you think

Opportunities, applications and real-world examples — where AI genuinely adds value in legal work, and where the risks lie.

90%
of lawyers now use generative AI
−30%
junior vacancies since 2024
€35M
maximum fine under the AI Act
01 — Introduction

The legal sector is changing faster than many firms realise

Where artificial intelligence was seen as an experimental tool just a few years ago, it has now become part of daily practice in law. Recent research shows that more than 90% of lawyers use generative AI for research, structuring case files, drafting memos and summarising documents.

At the same time, 66% of companies expect that within a few years AI will let them handle more legal work in-house — work that traditionally went to law firms. Clients experiment with tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Harvey and Copilot, while large firms invest millions in AI platforms and governance. Yet the reality is more complex than many headlines suggest.

90%
of lawyers use generative AI for legal work
66%
of companies expect to handle more legal work in-house with AI
−30%
drop in junior vacancies since early 2024 in AI-affected sectors
Source: Center for Law, AI & Design — survey of legal professionals, 2025/2026
The flip side

AI is an accelerator — and a risk

Judges and lawyers increasingly encounter AI-generated legal documents in which case law is misquoted or even entirely fabricated. In the Netherlands, several lawyers have already been reprimanded for careless use of AI systems. Careless use brings direct legal and reputational risks.

Real-world example

Sullivan & Cromwell

At this prestigious US law firm, AI-generated errors were discovered in court filings — including misquoted bankruptcy law and incorrect references to case law. The firm had to publicly apologise to the court.

It calls for fundamental choices:
01
Which tasks do you want to automate — and which deliberately not?
02
Which AI tools fit your practice?
03
How will your firm keep adding distinctive value?
04
How do you safeguard quality, confidentiality and governance?
02 — AI policy

Building AI policy for your firm

In law it is not only about efficiency, but above all about reliability, confidentiality and professional judgment. Clear guidelines for responsible AI use are therefore essential. Six principles to start with:

01

Make your AI policy practical and clear

Focus on concrete guidelines: which tools may be used, what AI may be used for, and when extra review is required.

02

Don’t ban AI — create clear frameworks

Many staff already use AI. Aim not for a ban, but for safe, responsible and controlled use within clear agreements.

03

Work with approved AI tools

Record which tools may be safely used for legal work, and under which conditions confidential information may be processed.

04

Define when human review is required

Not every use carries the same risk. Set rules for human verification — especially for client advice, court filings and legal analysis.

05

Protect confidentiality and client data

Include explicit guidelines on privacy, data storage and GDPR. Staff must know which information may never go into public AI tools.

06

Ownership, training and updates

A strong policy is not a one-off document but a continuous process. Assign ownership, train staff and update the policy regularly.

What a strong AI policy covers

Ethics, bias and faulty decision-making
Data use, storage and processing
Transparency towards clients
Cybersecurity, privacy and GDPR
Periodic risk assessments
Alignment with law and professional rules
Governance, ownership and oversight
Training and awareness
Transparency

Be open — including with clients

More and more firms — like Pallas Advocaten — actively publish their AI policy: what AI is used for, how quality and confidentiality are safeguarded, and that AI never replaces the lawyer’s professional judgment.

03 — The AI Act

The AI Act gives AI use a legal framework

The AI Act is the first comprehensive European law specifically targeting AI systems, working with rules based on risk levels. For law firms this means AI use is no longer only about innovation, but also about compliance, governance and responsible use — with emphasis on human oversight, transparency, data management and bias control.

Generative AI systems also fall under specific transparency obligations: in certain situations organisations must make clear when AI is used and how output is produced.

€35M / 7%
maximum fine — or 7% of global annual turnover — for violations.
Tijdlijn
The AI Act is being rolled out in phases from 2025. Regulators receive broad powers to enforce.
Risk-based — four levels
Minimal risk
Free to use. Think spam filters or simple tools.
Limited risk
Transparency duty — make clear that AI is being used.
High risk
Strict requirements: oversight, documentation, quality and data management.
Unacceptable
Prohibited applications — not allowed within the EU.
Want to know more? Read the AI Act e-book by ICT Recht →
04 — Case studies

How firms already put AI to work

From legal research and document analysis to knowledge management and process optimisation. Four firms show how to integrate AI responsibly and practically. Click to expand each case.

Van Doorne

PLATFORM: LEGORA
AI as an accelerator of strategic legal work
+

At Van Doorne, AI is fully embedded in practice. With their AI platform Legora they analyse documents and contracts at speed, so that first drafts of legal documents are largely ready. The result: less repetitive work and more focus on strategic advice for clients.

HVG Law

40+ TOOLS TESTED
Automating legal research — after thorough testing
+

HVG Law did not simply roll out AI — they researched it thoroughly first. Over eighteen months they tested more than 40 AI platforms for drafting and improving documents, analysing contracts and case files, producing quick first drafts and summarising information.

The differences between tools turned out to be large — especially on reliability, security and legal quality. In the end the firm chose the Rotterdam-based provider Zeno.

Shoosmiths

£1M BONUS
£1 million bonus for one million AI prompts
+

UK firm Shoosmiths set up a £1 million bonus pool after staff collectively ran more than one million AI prompts in Microsoft Copilot — for document analysis, summaries and administrative support. According to the firm, the strategy is not about replacing lawyers, but about creating more room for strategic, creative and client-focused work.

Loyens & Loeff

MEDLEX AI · HEALTHCARE
An AI service built specifically for healthcare
+

Loyens & Loeff introduced MedLex AI, an AI-driven legal service for healthcare organisations. The tool combines a secure legal knowledge base with AI to answer questions faster, analyse documents and draft preliminary advice. The output is then checked and validated by specialised healthcare lawyers — more scalable and accessible, without compromising on quality.

05 — Take action

Get started with AI in three phases

Successful AI adoption is not only about technology, but about strategy, governance, human oversight and practical application. Click a phase to see the approach — each with top-down and bottom-up steps.

PHASE 1
Redesign your strategy
PHASE 2
Put it into practice
PHASE 3
Embed it in your way of working

Not optimising, but positioning: where do you still add value as a firm when AI does much of the legal work faster and cheaper? AI touches the core of the profession — research, analysis and document creation.

01  Define your AI ambition 02  Choose where AI adds value 03  Redefine your role for clients
Top-down steps
1. Research AI risks and governance
2. Determine the role of AI in the firm
3. Build an AI strategy based on cases and workflows
Bottom-up steps
1. Jointly identify concrete use cases in daily work

Translate strategy into your daily work. Not big and complex, but practical: choose, test and improve along the Build–Measure–Learn cycle. This is how you experience where AI speeds up your work and truly adds value.

01  Choose a use case 02  Build: define your approach 03  Measure: assess the effect 04  Learn: evaluate critically 05  Improve and repeat
Top-down steps
1. Select and facilitate suitable AI tools
2. Set clear frameworks for safe, responsible use
3. Provide targeted training and support
Bottom-up steps
1. Apply AI to concrete tasks
2. Improve your approach and log your experiments
3. Share what works and what doesn’t with colleagues

What works in practice, you scale and anchor. AI is no longer an experiment, but a fixed part of processes, collaboration and service delivery.

01  Integration — start small in one team 02  Training — upskill your people 03  Scale — anchor across the firm 04  Monitor — steer on objectives
Top-down steps
1. Integrate AI into processes, systems and ways of working
2. Set up governance and ownership
3. Actively steer on quality, action and performance
Bottom-up steps
1. Apply AI structurally in daily work
2. Share best practices in applications
3. Keep optimising based on usage and results
06 — Self-scan

Becoming AI-native? Ten questions to ask yourself

Tick what is already in place at your firm. Your score shows how AI-native you are right now.

0 / 10
Early stage — plenty of room to shape an AI ambition.
Our AI ambition is clear — and all partners share it.
We know which legal tasks we want to improve with AI.
We know how AI helps us deliver better service.
We’ve made a choice: build, buy or partner.
We have the right conditions in place to apply AI.
We organise collaboration around AI within the firm.
Partners and senior lawyers ask the right AI questions.
We invest appropriately in AI given its strategic importance.
We measure the value of AI for clients and our work.
We learn and experiment quickly enough with AI.
07 — Don’t go it alone

Dutch startups are building legal AI

A growing number of Dutch players are developing AI specifically for law and case law — with emphasis on reliability, explainability and data protection.

LegalMike

An AI assistant for lawyers, built by lawyers and legal-tech specialists. Focused on legal research, case-file analysis and document creation based on Dutch and European legal sources. Data stays in the Netherlands and is not used to train models.

Zeno

A legal AI platform for law firms and legal teams. Focused on legal research, contract review and AI-assisted drafting, with emphasis on explainable output and transparent source references. Already in active use at Dutch firms.

Lexboost

An AI tool that analyses case law and legislation and quickly generates well-founded answers with source references. Aimed at lawyers, in-house counsel and notaries who want to do legal research faster.

Legal Mind

An AI platform that brings legal workflows, case-file analysis, document creation and knowledge management together in one environment — aimed at organising legal work more intelligently.

Named parties are illustrative and do not constitute an endorsement by Baionic.
Let’s talk.

Take your next step with AI, together with Baionic

Baionic has a team of AI experts ready to tackle your challenges — from strategy and governance to concrete applications on the Baionic platform.

Baionic
The impact of AI on legal work — whitepaper 2026
© 2026 Baionic · www.baionic.ai